<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>10</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Αμαλία Μόζερ</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Προβλήματα που προκύπτουν από τη διαχρονική εξέλιξη και τη συγχρονική χρήση του παρακειμένου [= Problems concerning the diachronic evolution and the synchronic use of the Perfect]</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Studies in Greek Linguistics 7</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1986</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Department of Linguistics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thessaloniki, Greece</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">149-161</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This paper examines the relative status of the various forms of the Perfect in Modern Greek within the theoretical framework of Grammaticalization, arguing that only one of these, namely the &lt;em&gt;ekho+infinitive&lt;/em&gt; form, is a genuine perfect periphrasis; it also deals with the implications that such an analysis would have for the explanation of the diachronic evolution of the Perfect.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>