@conference {23814,
	title = {Searching for faint AGN in the CDFS: an X-ray (Chandra) vs optical variability (HST) comparison.},
	year = {2017},
	month = {2017/10/1},
	pages = {88},
	abstract = {X-ray surveys are believed to be the most efficient way to detect AGN. Recently though, optical variability studies are claimed to probe even fainter AGN. We are presenting results from an HST study aimed to identify Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) through optical variability selection in the CDFS.. This work is part of the {\textquoteright}Hubble Catalogue of Variables{\textquoteright}project of ESA that aims to identify variable sources in the Hubble Source Catalogue.{\textquoteright} In particular, we used Hubble Space Telescope (HST) z-band images taken over 5 epochs and performed aperture photometry to derive the lightcurves of the sources. Two statistical methods (standard deviation \&amp; interquartile range) resulting in a final sample of 175 variable AGN candidates, having removed the artifacts by visual inspection and known stars and supernovae. The fact that the majority of the sources are extended and variable indicates AGN activity. We compare the efficiency of the method by comparing with the 7Ms Chandra detections. Our work shows that the optical variability probes AGN at comparable redshifts but at deeper optical magnitudes. Our candidate AGN (non detected in X-rays) have luminosities of L_x\&lt;6{\texttimes}10^{40} erg/sec at z\~{}0.7 suggesting that these are associated with low luminosity Seyferts and LINERS.},
	url = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017xru..conf...88G},
	author = {Georgantopoulos, I and Pouliasis, E. and Bonanos, A. and Sokolovsky, K. and Yang, M. and Hatzidimitriou, D. and Bellas, I. and Gavras, P. and Spetsieri, Z.}
}
