<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bartzela, T N</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Katsaros, C</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bronkhorst, E M</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rizell, S</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Halazonetis, D</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kuijpers-Jagtman, A M</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A two-centre study on facial morphology in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate at nine years of age.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</style></alt-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Age Factors</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alveoloplasty</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bone Transplantation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cephalometry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cleft Lip</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cleft Palate</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Clinical Protocols</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Face</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Facial Bones</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Female</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Follow-Up Studies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humans</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Incisor</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lip</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Male</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Maxilla</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Maxillofacial Development</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nose</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Osteotomy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Palatal Obturators</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Palate, Hard</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Palate, Soft</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Treatment Outcome</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011 Aug</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">40</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">782-9</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The aim of this study was to compare craniofacial morphology and soft tissue profiles in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate at 9 years of age, treated in two European cleft centres with delayed hard palate closure but different treatment protocols. The cephalometric data of 83 consecutively treated patients were compared (Gothenburg, N=44; Nijmegen, N=39). In total, 18 hard tissue and 10 soft tissue landmarks were digitized by one operator. To determine the intra-observer reliability 20 cephalograms were digitized twice with a monthly interval. Paired t-test, Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple regression models were applied for statistical analysis. Hard and soft tissue data were superimposed using the Generalized Procrustes Analysis. In Nijmegen, the maxilla was protrusive for hard and soft tissue values (P=0.001, P=0.030, respectively) and the maxillary incisors were retroclined (P&lt;0.001), influencing the nasolabial angle, which was increased in comparison with Gothenburg (P=0.004). In conclusion, both centres showed a favourable craniofacial form at 9-10 years of age, although there were significant differences in the maxillary prominence, the incisor inclination and soft tissue cephalometric values. Follow-up of these patients until facial growth has ceased, may elucidate components for outcome improvement.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21474284?dopt=Abstract</style></custom1></record></records></xml>