@article {6157,
	title = {Perverse fragments: citing Cavafy in crisis-stricken Athens},
	journal = {Journal of Greek Media \& Culture},
	volume = {1},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {191-205},
	abstract = {A publicity campaign run in Athens by the Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation in October 2013 in order to advertise its acquisition of the Cavafy Archive, until then lying in relevant obscurity, turned into a media disaster when critics and members of the public protested against what they argued was a misquoting of the highly revered Alexandrian. In this paper, I am looking at this rather entertaining story of misunderstood intentions in order to suggest that even though Cavafy himself may be shown to have enjoyed history as fragmented experience, and despite the fact that the modern archive is one of often conflicting partialities rather than one of completeness, we, as consumers of Cavafy{\textquoteright}s oeuvre, tend to sustain his long-established position as a paragon of Greek culture, canonised through his own nonconformity. As a typical case of {\textquoteleft}archive fever{\textquoteright}, the events described here confirm the political specificity of any literary discourse, even when conducted out of context (or <em>especially</em> so).},
	url = {http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/intellect/jgmc/2015/00000001/00000002/art00002}
}
