<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Evelpidou, N.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karkani, A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pirazzoli, P.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Late Holocene shorelines deduced from tidal notches on both sides of the Ionian Thrust: Fiscardo Peninsula (Cephalonia) and Ithaca Island.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The 8th International Conference on Geomorphology</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27-31 August</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Paris, France</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;div&gt;A submarine survey along the coasts of Ithaca and Fiscardo has permitted the&amp;nbsp;identification of fossil shorelines produced by recent co-seismic movements.&amp;nbsp;In both areas a tidal notch slightly submerged below present MSL was observed at&amp;nbsp;various sites. This “modern” notch is known to have been submerged by the global&amp;nbsp;sea-level rise during the 19th and 20th centuries. The depth after tide and air-pressure&amp;nbsp;correction of the vertex of the “modern” notch (= MSL before the recent sea-level&amp;nbsp;rise) was measured between -19±6 and -25±6 cm at Fiscardo and between -34±6 and&amp;nbsp;-43±6 cm at Ithaca. The presence of this “modern” notch at the same depth on both&amp;nbsp;sides of the Ionian Thrust would give evidence that both areas were not affected by&amp;nbsp;the co-seismic vertical movements that occurred in 1953 in the wider area, while a&amp;nbsp;greater depth in Ithaca could be an effect of co-seismic subsidence. Both cases are&amp;nbsp;discussed and analysed in this paper. Assuming that the development of the&amp;nbsp;“modern” notch was produced by bioerosion, it is possible to deduce a period of&amp;nbsp;relative sea-level stability before the 19th century during 2.4 to 4 centuries at Ithaca&amp;nbsp;and 1.5 to 4 centuries at Fiscardo.&amp;nbsp;Over the longer term, the tectonic behavior of Ithaca differs from Fiscardo. At&amp;nbsp;Ithaca no evidence of emergence has been found and Holocene vertical movements&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;have been only of subsidence: fossil submerged tidal notches can be distinguished&amp;nbsp;below MSL at depths (±6 cm) of about -40 (modern), -60, -75, -90, -100, -120, -130,&amp;nbsp;-140, -150 and -220 cm. A southward tilting of the island is suggested from the -110&amp;nbsp;cm notch, but this is not the case for the -70 cm shoreline.&amp;nbsp;On the east coast of Fiscardo Peninsula impacts of ancient earthquakes have left&amp;nbsp;some marks (±6 cm) of emergence at about +15 and +40 cm, and of submergence at&amp;nbsp;about -20 (modern) -35, -50, -60, -70, -80, -90, -100 and -230 cm, with even some&amp;nbsp;evidence of past uplift and subsidence at the same sites.&lt;/div&gt;</style></abstract></record></records></xml>