<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fountzilas, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Papadimitriou, C.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dafni, U.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bafaloukos, D.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skarlos, D.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Moulopoulos, L.A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Razis, E.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kalofonos, H.P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aravantinos, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Briassoulis, E.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Papakostas, P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Abela, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gogas, E.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kosmidis, P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">N. Pavlidis</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dimopoulos, M.A.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin and paclitaxel versus the combination, as first-line chemotherapy, in advanced breast cancer: A randomized study conducted by the hellenic cooperative oncology group</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Clinical Oncology</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2001</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2001</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0035871159&amp;partnerID=40&amp;md5=37081156b88161264fb971109f7da4cc</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">19</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2232 - 2239</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Purpose: To compare the efficacy of two different schedules of epirubicin and paclitaxel, as first-line chemotherapy, in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients and Methods: From October 1997 until May 1999, 183 eligible patients with ABC entered the study. Chemotherapy in group A (93 patients) consisted of four cycles of epirubicin at a dose of 110 mg/m2 followed by four cycles of paclitaxel at a dose of 225 mg/m2 in a 3-hour infusion. All cycles were repeated every 2 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. The therapeutic regimen in group B (90 patients) consisted of epirubicin (80 mg/m2) immediately followed by paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 in a 3-hour infusion) every 3 weeks for six cycles. Results: In total, 79 patients (85%) in group A and 72 patients (80%) in group B completed treatment. The median relative dose-intensity of epirubicin was 0.96 in both groups, and that of paclitaxel was 0.96 and 0.97 in groups A and B, respectively. The complete response rate was higher in group A (21.5% v 9% P = .02). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in the overall response rate between the two groups (55% v 42%, P = .10). Severe neutropenia was more frequently observed with concurrent treatment. After a median follow-up of 16.5 months, median time to progression was 10 months in group A and 8.5 months in group B (P = .27), and median survival was 21.5 and 20 months, respectively (P = .17). Conclusion: The present study failed to demonstrate a significant difference in overall response rate between dose-dense sequential administration of epirubicin and paclitaxel compared with the combination of the two drugs given on the same day, even though the sequential treatment resulted in a significantly higher complete response rate. © 2001 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cited By :23Export Date: 21 February 2017</style></notes></record></records></xml>