<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nakos, G</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karagiannis, S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ballas, S</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Galanis, P</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alevizopoulos, G</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nakos, A</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mavrogiannis, C</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A study comparing tolerability, satisfaction and acceptance of three different techniques for esophageal endoscopy: sedated conventional, unsedated peroral ultra thin, and esophageal capsule</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Diseases of the Esophagus</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oxford University Press</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">22</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">447-452</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1120-8694</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue></record></records></xml>