Halazonetis DJ.
Making slides for orthodontic presentations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113(5):586-9.
Halazonetis DJ.
Understanding orthodontic loop preactivation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113(2):237-41.
Halazonetis DJ.
Cephalometric analysis of changes in occlusal relationship. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20(4):449-61.
AbstractOne of the main problems in assessing the mode of action of various treatment modalities is the method of measuring the treatment change. The purpose of the present study was to develop a cephalometric method that would permit a detailed evaluation of the individual growth processes (skeletal and dental) that contribute to the overall change in occlusal relationship. The change in molar relationship was resolved in five components, i.e. translation of the maxilla, of the upper molar, of the mandible, of the lower molar, and rotation of the mandible. These movements were recorded using regional superimposition of various structures, with the aid of a computer program. Derotation of the mandible was performed to remove any confounding effects of total mandibular rotation on the interpretation of the measurements. The results show that assessment of treatment effects can be carried out by comparison of the five resulting vectors.
Halazonetis DJ.
Ideal arch force systems: a center-of-resistance perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114(3):256-64.
AbstractThe analysis of force systems from an ideal arch has shown that the ratio of the moments produced by a straight wire connecting two malaligned brackets depends on the ratio of the angulations of the brackets to the interbracket axis. Although this result permits assessment of the relative forces and moments, prediction of future tooth movement requires knowledge of the position of center of resistance as well. In this study, the forces and moments produced by a straight portion of an arch wire were transferred from the brackets to the center of resistance. The purpose was to compare the force system at the brackets to the force system at the center of resistance and to assess whether bracket geometry can be applied to predict initial tooth movement. A computer model was used to simulate two teeth connected by a straight portion of wire. Forces and moments were calculated with the use of equations derived from elementary beam theory. The results show that the force system at the center of resistance may be of an entirely different "geometry" type than that at the bracket. Factors that influence the force system include the interbracket distance, the angulation of the teeth, the length of the tooth root, and the width of the bracket.