Citation:
Stephanou Y. Necessary beings. Analysis. 2000;60(2):188-193.
Necessary beings.pdf | 567 KB |
Abstract:
This paper shows that some plausible assumptions about any object that has a name lead to the conclusion that the object could not have failed to exist. Considering the conclusion wrong, I argue that the source of the error is the principle “If something is the case, it could not have been impossible”, which occurs in some systems of modal logic; if an object did not exist, it would not be possible for it to exist.