The article discusses the significance of on-the-spot observation and eye witnessing as powerfulscientific tools for establishing the real in the early sixteenth century. In particular, I argue that thesimulation of such tools in the paratextual material to Utopia, especially the prefatory/postscriptletters, enhance, preemptively, the verisimilitude of the Utopian society as well as the materialityof the island at hand. If eye witnessing is reality-conferring, then, the powerful Renaissance actof reading a text as a simulation of eye witnessing is reality-conferring too. In this light, to readUtopia through the paratextual letters is to place one’s trust in the literal existence of Utopia insofaras reading simulates the act of seeing with one’s own eyes and bearing witness to a palpable reality.Keywords: Eye Witnessing, Humanism, Paratext, Utopia, Verisimilitude1. Paratext, Utopia and LiminalityNearly five hundred years after its first publication in 1516, Thomas More’sUtopia continues to spark endless discussions in relation to its potentialmeanings or its exact nature.1 More could not have written Utopia at a bettertime. As Alistair Fox maintains, when he sat down to write it in 1515, ‘Hisimagination had been excited by the discoveries of Cabot and Vespucci in theNew World… the momentum of Erasmian reform was approaching its height;and he had the stimulating company… of Cuthbert Tunstal, Busleyden andPeter Giles, humanists with interests and ambitions similar to his own’ (1984,53). The publication of Utopia was accompanied by paratextual material (attimes called parerga) – maps, illustrations, verses as well as a number of letterswritten by friends or acquaintances from the wider humanist continentalcircles. By fervently supporting the project, this paratextual material – whichwas altered to a great degree from edition to edition, thus also constantlyreshaping readers’ reception of Utopia – worked towards legitimising More’sendeavour, establishing its truthfulness, and announcing beforehand its acceptanceby early sixteenth-century readership.2‘Paratext’ in literature covers everything that lies around a text. GérardGenette has famously called paratext ‘a zone between text and off-text, a zonenot only of transition but also of transaction’ between the author(s) and thepublic, or ‘the most socialized side of the practice of literature’ (1997, 1, 14).