Publications by Year: 2005

2005
Inclan G, Suarez E, Calvo R, Aguirre C, Macheras P, Gazouli M, Lukas JC. Bicompartmental kinetics of tobramycin analysed with a wide range of covariates. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS. 2005;26:304-311.Abstract
{The pharmacokinetics of tobramycin was studied in adult patients (N = 151) admitted either for initial suspicion of Gram-negative infection or for prophylaxis. In addition to age, weight, height and creatinine clearance (CrCL), a range of other covariates were also analysed, including type of pathology, co-medication, fever, sex and ethnicity (Basque or not). All patients received 100 mg tobramycin every 8 h and samples were collected at three time points after the first dose and at two time points after the fourth dose and assayed with a fluorescence polarisation immunoassay. The population mixed effects bicompartmental parameters were obtained from 725 concentration measurements using NONMEM, FOCE method, and were: systemic clearance
Karalis V, Macheras P, Symillides M. Geometric mean ratio-dependent scaled bioequivalence limits with leveling-off properties. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES. 2005;26:54-61.Abstract
In this study, novel approaches for the design of bioequivalence (BE) limits are developed. The new BE limits scale with intrasubject variability but only until a geometric mean ratio (GMR)-dependent plateau value and combine the classic (0.80-1.25) and expanded (0.70-1.43) BE limits into a single criterion. Plots of the extreme GMR values accepted as a function of coefficient of variation (CV) have a convex shape, similar to the classic unscaled 0.80-1.25 limits. The performance of the novel approaches in comparison to the classic unscaled 0.80-1.25 limits as well as the two expanded BE limits, i.e., 0.70-1.43 and 0.75-1.33 was assessed using simulated data. Two-period crossover BE investigations with 12, 24 or 36 subjects were simulated with assumptions of CV 10%, 20%, 30% or 40%. At low CV values, the performance of the novel BE limits is almost identical to the 0.80-1.25 criterion. On the contrary, the expanded BE limits are very permissive even at high GMR values. For high CV% values (30% and 40%), the new BE limits show a much greater probability of declaring BE when GMR = 1 in comparison to the classic 0.80-1.25 limits. In addition, when the drug products differ more than 25%, the new BE limits show much lower percentage of acceptance than the expanded 0.70-1.43 limits. One of the major advantages of the new BE limits is their gradual expansion with variability until a GMR-dependent plateau value. Finally, the continuity and leveling-off properties of the new BE limits make them suitable for the assessment of BE studies, irrespective of the level of variability encountered. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Dokoumetzidis A, Kosmidis K, Argyrakis P, Macheras P. Modeling and Monte Carlo simulations in oral drug absorption. BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY. 2005;96:200-205.Abstract
Drug dissolution, release and uptake are the principal components of oral drug absorption. All these processes take place in the complex milieu of the gastrointestinal tract and they are influenced by physiological (e.g. intestinal pH, transit time) and physicochemical factors (e.g. dose, particle size, solubility, permeability). Due to the enormous complexity issues involved, the models developed for drug dissolution and release attempt to capture their heterogeneous features. Hence, Monte Carlo simulations and population methods have been utilized since both dissolution and release processes are considered as time evolution of a population of drug molecules moving irreversibly from the solid state to the solution. Additionally, mathematical models have been proposed to determine the effect of the physicochemical properties, solubility/dose ratio and permeability on the extent of absorption for regulatory purposes, e.g. biopharmaceutics classification. The regulatory oriented approaches are based on the tube model of the intestinal lumen and apart from the drug's physicochemical properties, take into account the formulation parameters the dose and the particle size.