BACKGROUND: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has been used prior to valve implantation of a self-expandable valve as part of the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedure. We aimed to evaluate the impact of BAV prior to TAVI. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 203 consecutive patients who were treated either with (pre-BAV-TAVI group) or without BAV (D-TAVI group). Implantation depth (ID) was angiographically measured at non-coronary cusp (NCC) and left coronary cusp (LCC) at: the starting point (stage-1), before (stage-2), and after (stage-3) final bioprosthesis release. Paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) and 1-year clinical follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: Overall, from stage-1 to stage-3, prosthesis migrated toward the left ventricle, in both cusps and groups. At NCC a forward migration was observed from stage-1 to stage-2 in both groups (p<0.001). In the pre-BAV-TAVI group only, at NCC, an upward migration decreased the ID from stage-2 to stage-3 (p=0.022). PVR ≥grade 2, immediately after expansion was more frequently observed in pre-BAV-TAVI group (41% vs 22%, respectively; p=0.024). However, PVR was similar at discharge. Clinical parameters were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of BAV prior to TAVI may have an impact on device final position, but not on short- and long-term clinical outcome.

Carotid atherosclerosis represents a primary cause for cerebrovascular ischemic events and its contemporary management includes surgical revascularization for moderate to severe symptomatic stenoses. However, the role of invasive therapy seems to be questioned lately for asymptomatic cases. Numerous reports have suggested that the presence of neovessels within the atherosclerotic plaque remains a significant vulnerability factor and over the last decade imaging modalities have been used to identify intraplaque neovascularization in an attempt to risk-stratify patients and offer management guidance. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the carotid artery is a relatively novel diagnostic tool that exploits resonated ultrasound waves from circulating microbubbles. This property permits vascular visualization by producing superior angiography-like images, and allows the identification of vasa vasorum and intraplaque microvessels. Moreover, plaque neovascularization has been associated with plaque vulnerability and ischemic symptoms lately as well. At the same time, attempts have been made to quantify contrast-enhanced ultrasonography signal using sophisticated software packages and algorithms, and to correlate it with intraplaque microvascular density. The aim of this review was to collect all recent data on the characteristics, performance, and prognostic role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography regarding carotid stenosis management, and to produce useful conclusions for clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: Red blood cell microparticles (RBCm) have potential adverse vascular effects and they have been shown to be elevated in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The purpose of this study is to investigate their relationship with biochemical infarct size. METHODS: RBCm were quantified with flow cytometry in blood drawn from 60 STEMI patients after a primary angioplasty. The creatine kinase-myocardial brain fraction (CK-MB) was measured at predefined time points and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: RBCm count was correlated with CK-MB AUC (Spearman's ρ = 0.83, p < 0.001). The CK-MB AUC values per RBCm quartile (lower to upper) were: 3,351 (2,452-3,608), 5,005 (4,450-5,424), 5,903 (4,862-10,594), and 8,406 (6,848-12,782) ng × h/ml, respectively. From lower to upper quartiles, the maximal troponin I values were: 42.2 (23.3-49.3), 49.6 (28.8-54.1), 59.2 (41.4-77.3), and 69.1 (48.0-77.5) ng/ml (p = 0.005). In multivariable analysis, RBCm remained a significant predictor of CK-MB AUC (standardized β = 0.63, adjusted p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Erythrocyte microparticles appear to be related to the total myocardial damage biomarker output. The exact pathophysiologic routes, if any, for this interaction remain to be identified. However, these results suggest that erythrocytes may be a - thus far virtually ignored - player in the pathogenesis of ischemic injury.

BACKGROUND: Syncope is a common problem in the elderly, and a permanent pacemaker is a therapeutic option when a bradycardic etiology is revealed. However, the benefit of pacing when no association of symptoms to bradycardia has been shown is not clear, especially in the elderly. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pacing on syncope-free mortality in patients aged 80 years or older with unexplained syncope and "positive" invasive electrophysiologic testing (EPT). METHODS: This was an observational study. A positive EPT for the purposes of this study was defined by at least 1 of the following: a corrected sinus node recovery time of >525 ms, a basic HV interval of >55 ms, detection of infra-Hisian block, or appearance of second-degree atrioventricular block on atrial decremental pacing at a paced cycle length of >400 ms. RESULTS: Among the 2435 screened patients, 228 eligible patients were identified, 145 of whom were implanted with a pacemaker. Kaplan-Meier analysis determined that time to event (syncope or death) was 50.1 months (95% confidence interval 45.4-54.8 months) with a pacemaker vs 37.8 months (95% confidence interval 31.3-44.4 months) without a pacemaker (log-rank test, P = .001). The 4-year time-dependent estimate of the rate of syncope was 12% vs 44% (P < .001) and that of any-cause death was 41% vs 56% (P = .023), respectively. The multivariable odds ratio was 0.25 (95% confidence interval 0.15-0.40) after adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSION: In patients with unexplained syncope and signs of sinus node dysfunction or impaired atrioventricular conduction on invasive EPT, pacemaker implantation was independently associated with longer syncope-free survival. Significant differences were also shown in the individual components of the primary outcome measure (syncope and death from any cause).

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease remains the leading cause of death globally. Dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and aP2Y12 receptor significantly reduces thrombotic events. However, antiplatelet drug response displays considerable interindividual variability. METHODS: Genetic factors account for up to 70% of impaired drug response. A number of genes encoding proteins involved in the pharmacokinetic pathway have been found to alter drug response. RESULTS: According to most studies, CYP2C19 gene is the strongest genetic determinant. The novel antiplatelet agents prasugrel and ticagrelor, seem to overcome genetic restrictions but in expense of increased bleeding rates. Achieving a balance between adequate platelet inhibition and bleeding complications is challenging. CONCLUSION: Genetic screening may provide valuable guidance towards an efficient antiplatelet treatment. However, the lack of randomized controls trials testing the effect of a genotype-guided therapy, forbids the implementation of genetic testing into clinical practice.

Transcatheter interventions for structural heart disease represent an emerging field in interventional cardiology. Undoubtedly, there is an absolute necessity for antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation treatment prior, during and post such interventions. However, currently administered regimens are mainly based in expert consensus recommendations. In the present review we aim to summarize data regarding anti platelet and/or anticoagulation treatment in the following transcatheter structural heart interventions: left atrial appendage closure, atrial septal defect closure, patent foramen oval closure, paravalvular leak closure.

BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage is the pathological accumulation of blood within the brain. It is a type of stroke more likely to be lethal or to severely disable the patient and results from a wide variety of causes. On the other hand antithrombotic therapy is used for the prevention or/and the therapy of thromboembolic episodes. Antithrombotic drugs are very effective in reducing risk or mortality rate after a thromboembolic event, yet they are associated with significant hemorrhages. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to review current literature for intracerebral hemorrhage and antithrombotic therapy and offer recommendations on the reversal, the discontinuation and the resumption of antithrombotic therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Current literature has been reviewed for intracerebral hemorrhage associated with three major categories of patients, those with atrial fibrillation, those with prosthetic mechanical valves and those with venous thromboembolism. Antithrombotic therapy is categorized in antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants. The risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, of a thromboembolic event and of a rebleeding with or without antithrombotic therapy was also reported. CONCLUSION: Although no one can deny the usefulness of antithrombotic therapy a therapeutic strategy should be developed in order to optimize the clinical decision of stopping, reversing and restarting antithrombotic treatment. This review concludes in strong recommendations, yet a multidisciplinary panel by a stroke physician or neurologist, a cardiologist, a neuroradiologist and a neurosurgeon should evaluate the benefits and the risks for each patient and decide the best therapeutic strategy.

Catheter ablation for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation has been recognized as an established treatment. Patients with atrial fibrillation suffer from an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Long-term stroke risk and mortality have been shown to be reduced after catheter ablation, still the procedure per se is associated with an additive peri-procedural thromboembolic risk. Maintenance of the thrombotic - bleeding equilibrium in such patients during interventional procedures is compelling. Lack of data from randomized studies along with the recent introduction of novel oral anticoagulants in clinical practice has resulted in a wide variance of antithrombotic treatment approaches. Procedural interruption of anticoagulants, switching of anticoagulation scheme (i.e. from novel oral anticoagulants to vitamin K antagonists), bridging with heparin, timing of re-initiation of therapy and/or utilization of novel oral anticoagulants have all been points of dispute. In the present review we present the available data regarding optimal peri-procedural anticoagulation strategies in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Vagal responses (VR) during left atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment have been reported to be associated with less recurrences, presumably because they are a sign of ganglionated plexi modification. Our objective was to evaluate whether coincidentally elicited VR during left atrial ablation are associated with lower AF recurrence rates. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective study of 291 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Vagal responses were defined as episodes of heart rate <40 bpm or asystole lasting >5 s elicited during energy application. Sixty-eight patients (23.4%) had a VR during ablation. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, mean recurrence-free survival was 449 days (95% confidence interval 411-488) in patients with VR when compared with 435 days (95% confidence interval 415-455) in those without (P = 0.310). The 12-month recurrence rate estimates were 25 and 27%, respectively. In an unadjusted Cox model, VR was associated with an odds ratio for recurrence of 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.46-1.28). CONCLUSION: Coincidentally elicited VR during radiofrequency PVI in patients with paroxysmal AF do not appear to be related to lower risk of arrhythmia recurrence. This may mean that, even if a VR is truly a sign of coincidental ablation of a ganglionated plexus, this does not necessarily mean that a therapeutic modification has been effected, at least to a degree associated with clinical benefit.

Over the course of the last 2 decades, the concept of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) has attracted considerable research interest, because RIC, in most of its embodiments offers an inexpensive way of protecting tissues against ischemic damage inflicted by a number of medical conditions or procedures. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common side effect in the context of various medical procedures, and RIC has been suggested as a means of reducing its incidence. Outcomes regarding kidney function have been reported in numerous studies that evaluated the effects of RIC in a variety of settings (eg, cardiac surgery, interventions requiring intravenous administration of contrast media). Although several individual studies have implied a beneficial effect of RIC in preserving kidney function, 3 recently published randomized controlled trials evaluating more than 1000 patients each (Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in the Cardiac Surgery, Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning for Heart Surgery, and ERICCA) were negative. However, AKI or any other index of renal function was not a stand-alone primary end point in any of these trials. On the other hand, a range of meta-analyses (each including thousands of participants) have reported mixed results, with the most recent among them showing benefit from RIC, pinpointing at the same time a number of shortcomings in published studies, adversely affecting the quality of available data. The present review provides a critical appraisal of the current state of this field of research. It is the opinion of the authors of this review that there is a clear need for a common clinical trial framework for ischemic conditioning studies. If the current babel of definitions, procedures, outcomes, and goals persists, it is most likely that soon ischemic conditioning will be "yesterday's news" with no definitive conclusions having been reached in terms of its real clinical utility.