AIM: To characterize different patterns of variability of three repeated within-visit blood pressure (BP) readings and to determine the prevalence of specific variation trends in systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) blood pressure and pulse pressure (PP). METHODS: Data from 53 737 subjects from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed. In each subject, three consecutive BP measurements were performed with a minimum time-interval of at least 30 s. We propose three patterns of within-visit BP variability (separately for SBP, DBP and PP): (1) increasing trend (BP3 > BP2 > BP1); (2) decreasing trend (BP1 > BP2 > BP3) and (3) no trend (BP3 ≈ BP2 ≈ BP1). A threshold of minimum change (ΔP > 3 mmHg) between BP1-BP2 and BP2-BP3 was also applied as a prerequisite for the definition of these trends. RESULTS: An increasing trend was observed among three consecutive measurements of SBP, DBP and PP in 7.4, 10.4 and 10.2%, respectively. When a minimum threshold of 3 mmHg was set the respective increasing trends were observed in 1.8, 2.9 and 4.4%, respectively. There was a higher prevalence of decreasing trend within three consecutive SBP, DBP and PP readings: 17, 13.1 and 16.2%, respectively, whereas using a threshold of ΔP >3 mmHg the respective prevalence was 6.3, 4.1 and 7.7%. A maximum absolute difference >10 mmHg within triplicate of SBP/DBP/PP readings was observed in 12.9, 13 and 29.4%, respectively. In the era of personalized medicine, these patterns are well worth further investigation concerning their pathophysiologic and clinical relevance.

Patient involvement in therapeutic strategies leading to lifestyle changes and increasing adherence to beneficial treatment is important for high risk coronary artery disease patients. The hypothesis of the present substudy was that a program of education specifically structured to educate postmyocardial infarction patients would lead to measurable differences in specific indices of cardiovascular risk. Post-MI patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Patients in the intervention arm attended an 8-week long educational program in addition to usual treatment and controls received standard treatment. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, body-mass index, and glycosylated hemoglobin were assessed at baseline and at 12 months (values are reported as median [interquartile range]). One hundred ninety-eight consecutively randomized patients were included in the present substudy. The median change in Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was -54 (-45 to [-62]) mg/dl in the intervention group as compared with -35 (-28 to [-43]) mg/dl in controls (p <0.001). Systolic blood pressure change was -7.5 (-15.3 to 0.3) mm Hg and -3.0 (-11.8 to 2.8) mm Hg, respectively (p = 0.011). The median change in body-mass index was 0.0 (-3.0 to 3.0) kg/m as compared with 2.0 (-1.0 to 3.9) kg/m, respectively (p = 0.002). The reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin was significant in both groups with a median absolute change of -0.29 (-1.11 to 0.09) % in the intervention group and -0.24 (-0.69 to 0.06) % in controls (p = 0.168). If only diabetic patients were considered, the change was -0.65 (-1.3 to [-0.23]) % in the intervention group versus -0.41 (-0.74 to [-0.07]) % in controls (p = 0.021). In conclusion, a relatively short patient education program may have long-lasting effects on established modifiable markers of cardiovascular risk.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) led to the foundation of the subspecialty of structural heart interventions and created an emerging area of clinical and technical issues. Soon after TAVI introduction into clinical practice, boundaries were expanded with utilization of valve-in-valve (V-i-V) techniques. V-i-V comprised a diverse subset of patients including TAVI within TAVI, TAVI within a degenerated surgically implanted bioprosthesis, or even TAVI-in-TAVI-in-surgical bioprosthesis. In the present review, we summarize the available literature and present initial experience on the field in Greece.

BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)1 is characterized by the pathological accumulation of blood within the brain parenchyma, most commonly associated with hypertension, arteriovenous malformations, or trauma. However, it can also present in patients receiving antithrombotic drugs, either anticoagulants such as acenocoumarol/warfarin-novel oral anticoagulants or antiplatelets, for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review is to present current bibliographic data regarding ICH irrespective of the cause, as well as post-hemorrhage use of antithrombotic agents. Moreover, this review attempts to provide guidelines concerning the termination, inversion, and of course resumption of antithrombotic therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed the most recently presented available data for patients who dealt with intracerebral hemorrhagic events while on antithrombotic agents (due to atrial fibrillation, prosthetic mechanical valves or recent/recurrent deep vein thrombosis). Furthermore, we examined and compared the thromboembolic risk, the bleeding risk, as well as the re-bleeding risk in two groups: patients receiving antithrombotic therapy versus patients not on antithrombotic therapy. CONCLUSION: Antithrombotic therapy is of great importance when indicated, though it does not come without crucial side-effects, such as ICH. Optimal timing of withdrawal, reversal, and resumption of antithrombotic treatment should be determined by a multidisciplinary team consisting of a stroke specialist, a cardiologist, and a neurosurgeon, who will individually approach the needs and risks of each patient.

OBJECTIVE: Colchicine has been utilized safely in a variety of cardiovascular clinical conditions. Among its potential mechanisms of action is the non-selective inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome which is thought to be a major pathophysiologic component in the clinical course of patients with COVID-19. GRECCO-19 will be a prospective, randomized, open-labeled, controlled study to assess the effects of colchicine in COVID-19 complications prevention. METHODS: Patients with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (under RT PCR) and clinical picture that involves temperature >37.5 oC and at least two out of the: i. sustained coughing, ii. sustained throat pain, iii. Anosmia and/or ageusia, iv. fatigue/tiredness, v. PaO2<95 mmHg will be included. Patients will be randomised (1:1) in colchicine or control group. RESULTS: Trial results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. CONCLUSION: GRECCO-19 trial aims to identify whether colchicine may positively intervene in the clinical course of COVID-19. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04326790).

BACKGROUND: Within-visit variability of repeated sequential readings of blood pressure (BP) is an important phenomenon that may affect precision of BP measurement and thus decision making concerning BP-related risk and hypertension management. However, limited data exist concerning predictive ability of within-visit BP variability for clinical outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between the variability of three repeated office BP measurements and the risk of all-cause mortality, independent of BP levels. METHODS: Data collected through the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were analysed. NHANES is a program of studies designed to assess health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States. A complete set of three sequential BP measurements, together with survival status, were available for 24969 individuals (age 46.8±;19.3 years, 49% males). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the prognostic ability of the examined demographic, clinical, and haemodynamic indices. RESULTS: Among various examined indices of variability of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure measurements, the standard deviation of DBP (DBPSD) was the stronger independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio 1.064, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.011-1.12) after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, SBP, heart rate, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolaemia, and cardiovascular events. CONCLUSION: Within-visit variability of three sequential office DBP readings may allow for the identification of high-risk patients better than mean SBP and DBP levels. The predictive value of within-visit BP variability and methods to improve its clinical application are worthy of further research.

IMPORTANCE: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection has evolved into a global pandemic. Low-dose colchicine combines anti-inflammatory action with a favorable safety profile. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of treatment with colchicine on cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial (the Greek Study in the Effects of Colchicine in COVID-19 Complications Prevention), 105 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were randomized in a 1:1 allocation from April 3 to April 27, 2020, to either standard medical treatment or colchicine with standard medical treatment. The study took place in 16 tertiary hospitals in Greece. INTERVENTION: Colchicine administration (1.5-mg loading dose followed by 0.5 mg after 60 min and maintenance doses of 0.5 mg twice daily) with standard medical treatment for as long as 3 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end points were (1) maximum high-sensitivity cardiac troponin level; (2) time for C-reactive protein to reach more than 3 times the upper reference limit; and (3) time to deterioration by 2 points on a 7-grade clinical status scale, ranging from able to resume normal activities to death. Secondary end points were (1) the percentage of participants requiring mechanical ventilation, (2) all-cause mortality, and (3) number, type, severity, and seriousness of adverse events. The primary efficacy analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were evaluated (61 [58.1%] men; median [interquartile range] age, 64 [54-76] years) with 50 (47.6%) randomized to the control group and 55 (52.4%) to the colchicine group. Median (interquartile range) peak high-sensitivity cardiac troponin values were 0.0112 (0.0043-0.0093) ng/mL in the control group and 0.008 (0.004-0.0135) ng/mL in the colchicine group (P = .34). Median (interquartile range) maximum C-reactive protein levels were 4.5 (1.4-8.9) mg/dL vs 3.1 (0.8-9.8) mg/dL (P = .73), respectively. The clinical primary end point rate was 14.0% in the control group (7 of 50 patients) and 1.8% in the colchicine group (1 of 55 patients) (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.01-0.96; P = .02). Mean (SD) event-free survival time was 18.6 (0.83) days the in the control group vs 20.7 (0.31) in the colchicine group (log rank P = .03). Adverse events were similar in the 2 groups, except for diarrhea, which was more frequent with colchicine group than the control group (25 patients [45.5%] vs 9 patients [18.0%]; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, participants who received colchicine had statistically significantly improved time to clinical deterioration. There were no significant differences in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin or C-reactive protein levels. These findings should be interpreted with caution. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04326790.

The use of mobile health (mHealth) in the field of medicine is constantly evolving and advancing. Arterial hypertension, a major modifiable cardiovascular risk factor with a high prevalence in the general population, frequently remains underdiagnosed and thus untreated. Furthermore, the majority of hypertensive patients fail to achieve blood pressure target levels. The purpose of this review is to identify and evaluate current use of mHealth strategies, with focus on mobile phones, smartphones and applications, in the management of patients with arterial hypertension. Current mobile technology has the capacity to inform and motivate the general public for timely diagnosis of hypertension, to facilitate communication between physicians and patients, to aid in the monitoring of blood pressure levels and the optimization of treatment and to promote, in general, a healthy lifestyle and assist in the management of other cardiovascular risk factors. There is potential for positive impact of mHealth technology in the management of arterial hypertension, as well as probable detrimental effects that warrant caution. The research in this field is ongoing and future well-conducted studies are needed in order to establish the use of mobile technology in arterial hypertension management.