The main purpose of this study is the subsurface investigation of two complex geological environments focusing on the improvement of data acquisition and processing parameters regarding electric and seismic tomographic techniques. Two different study areas, in central–east Peloponnese and SE Attica, were selected, where detailed geological mapping and surface geophysical survey were carried out. The applied geophysical survey included the application of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), seismic refraction tomography (SRT) and ground penetrating radar (GPR). The geoelectrical measurements were acquired with different arrays and electrode configurations. Moreover, various types of seismic sources were used at seventeen shot locations along the seismic arrays. For the processing of geoelectrical data, clustered datasets were created, increasing the depth of investigation and discriminatory capability. The seismic data processing included the following: (a) the creation of synthetic models and seismic records to determine the effectiveness and capabilities of the technique, (b) spectral analysis of the seismic records to determine the optimal seismic source type and (c) inversion of the field data to create representative subsurface velocity models. The results of the two techniques successfully delineated the complex subsurface structure that characterizes these two geological environments. The application of the ERT combined with the SRT are the two dominant, high-resolution techniques for the elucidation of complex subsurface structures.

Ground fissures have occurred in the last four decades across the eastern Thessaly basin (Greece) resulting in damage to the villages of the area. Several studies for the area refer to the over-pumping of ground water as the main reason for their occurrence, causing sediment compaction due to the reduction of the aquifer level. In this paper, we depict the results of a joint geophysical survey trying to determine the subsurface regime of the basin and the exact reasons contributing to the existence of the ground fissures. The focal part of the survey includes gravity measurements for deeper investigation, combined with existing and already presented geoelectrical and electromagnetic data. Several borehole data have also been used for the calibration of the geophysical interpretation. The differential GNSS data of the gravity campaign revealed the ground subsidence of the area, reaching up to 9.16 m. The alpine basement of the area is comprised mainly of metamorphic rocks, such as marbles, mica schists and gneiss-schists, covered by thick fluviοterrestrial and alluvial deposits. Several structural maps were generated in order to delineate the lateral density variations that could be related to fault zones along with the interpretive sections for geological modelling. The alpine bedrock was adumbrated in relatively great depths, with a large anticline of NW-SE direction, rising and separating the basin in two parts. In the east part, the fluvioterrestrial deposits, which are expected to play an important role in the compaction due to their water aquifer, are located only west of this anticline. At the east part, where the old lake Karla was hosted, the alluvial deposits lay directly on the alpine basement in smaller depths. This complicated regime is responsible for differential sediment compaction and the ground subsidence of the surface.